The value of information
I’ve probably said something like this before, but it’s worth saying again.
This was part of a post by Amelia Kassel of MarketingBase – on the AIIP member mailing list.
I recall someone in a workshop I gave about using the Internet for CI about 10 years ago. I introduced the concept of fee-based databases and a young fellow from a business analyst firm raised his hand in front of group of more than 30 participants to stop me from proceeding. He didn’t want to hear or learn about fee-based databases. He had tried them once and they were too hard to use. I asked what he did when couldn’t find information he was looking for on the Internet and he didn’t have an answer but said it didn’t really matter.
I’ve also come across attitudes such as this – why pay for information when you can find it for free. That would be true and valid if the time required to find the information, and the work required to put it into a usable format, was the same. In reality this is rarely the case. The advantage of paying for information from services such as Factiva, Dialog and several other similar services is that you can save a lot of time. The information purchased will be formatted consistently – so it becomes much easier to edit for a report.
Further, relevant information is collected together so there is no need to check hundreds of potential sources. These services index thousands of sources in a way that users of the free services, including Google, can only dream about. As an example, on Factiva, you can specify that search terms appear in the first 50 (or 100 or whatever) words of an article, or within so many words of another term. They support full Boolean searching and wildcard searching far beyond what even the advanced search in Exalead offers.
If that was all such services offered then there could be an argument that with today’s budgetary constraints, good researchers would first focus on the free sources. However many sources held won’t even be available on the free web, as their publishers only make them available on a pay-to-use basis or don’t keep full online archives. This means that unless the researcher has accounts with a multitude of publishers they won’t get the material they need for decision making.
I think part of the secret of being a good researcher is knowing when to use free sources and when to use fee sources. I’m sure that a proportion of the information that is available on pay-to-use sources could be found for free – IF you looked long and hard enough. However employers pay you for your time – and just because something is free doesn’t make it really free if you have had to spend a day finding it when you could have got it within 15 minutes by paying. Then there’s the risk factors of NOT finding something at all!
People who feel it doesn’t matter – that you can justify not paying for information – are actually high-risk employees. They may provide information that allows correct decision making to be made 80% of the time. Unfortunately the Pareto effect comes into play – and that 20% of the time they get it wrong represents 80% of the risk. Decisions made on inadequate data are likely to lead to serious consequences when they are wrong. Saying that you only did a Google search because Factiva cost too much won’t save you or your company in such situations – as it will be too late.

Recent Posts
- Apple & disruptive innovation: 4 questions innovators need to ask before moving forward!
- X-mas Advertising: John Lewis, M&S and Debenhams Christmas Ad Campaigns Compared
- Competition or Co-operation? Collaborate & Co-operate to build and not to destroy.
- Freedom of Speech, Abuse and Social Media
- Pluralistic Ignorance
- Testing perceptions – Myers-Briggs and false appearances
- The iWatch – is this the next disruptive innovation from Apple?
- If you will it, it is no dream…
- The impact of disruptive innovation – on PCs and on Retail
- Why six-sigma, just-in-time and lean manufacturing are dangerous!
- Entrpreneurs 2012 – Con-Trick or Conference: a review!
- Microsoft’s Surface and Disruptive Innovation!
Archives
Topic List
Tag Cloud
AIIP Amazon analysis Apple applegate AWARE bias Bible Bing case study change China CI communication competitive analysis Competitive Intelligence Competitive Strategy competitor analysis competitors counter-intelligence decision making disinformation disruptive innovation Education ethics exalead Facebook Gaza Genesis Google Google Squared India industrial espionage information information collection innovation intelligence ipad iran islam Israel Key intelligence topics KITs lateral thinking leadership leaks LinkedIn management marketing marketing intelligence Microsoft networking news news analysis Other plagiarism privacy product development Sarah Palin scenario planning SCIP search engine search engines searching Security social media statistics strategy terrorism Twitter Wikileaks Wikipedia WolframAlpha yahoo! YaubaBlogroll
- AWARE – Competitive Intelligence for Business Success AWARE’s web-site – lots of options to learn more about CI and MI.
- Julian's The Write Way – How to produce good documentation
- Miriyummy – recipes & stories behind them
Competitive Intelligence Blogs, etc.
Ideas for Marketing and Information
Search Information
Worth a visit...
Latest Tweets…
- 3 people followed me // automatically checked by fllwrs.com 1 day ago
- Still not too late to book a place on the next ICI #OSINT workshop - 6-7th Feb 2023 (via Zoom) - €695. I've revis… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 5 days ago
- The latest AWARE Weekly Update! paper.li/awareci?share_… Thanks to @The_Cyber_News @brownecfm @SK_Expert #strategy #business 6 days ago
- Another Dilbert cartoon on ChatGPT - this time with a different perspective and an important point for any form of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago
- The Biblical story told in the first chapters of Exodus is an interesting examination on leadership and the require… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago
- I've made several posts on ChatGPT. Initially I was really impressed - but then I and several others saw weaknesses… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago
- The latest AWARE Weekly Update! paper.li/awareci?share_… Thanks to @osintbear @DrProksch #strategy #business 1 week ago
- Our TrustPilot review on @CET_UK's emergency service. trustpilot.com/reviews/63bc5c… Be warned! 74% of reviews in last 30… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 weeks ago
- TOMORROW: SLA CIC's Webinar: "Gaining Market Insights from Events. How to Outmaneuver Your Competitors Using Event… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 weeks ago
- The latest AWARE Weekly Update! paper.li/awareci?share_… Thanks to @cavie_acci #strategy #business 2 weeks ago
Competitive Intelligence News
- Retailers Create New Growth Opportunities with Bungee Tech's ... - Digital Journal January 27, 2023Retailers Create New Growth Opportunities with Bungee Tech's ... Digital Journal
- Competitive Intelligence Tools Market Analysis by Size, Business ... - Digital Journal January 20, 2023Competitive Intelligence Tools Market Analysis by Size, Business ... Digital Journal
- Competitive Intelligence Software Market Strategies, Future Plans ... - Digital Journal January 16, 2023Competitive Intelligence Software Market Strategies, Future Plans ... Digital Journal
- Global Mobile Gaming Market Report 2022: Trends and ... - Business Wire January 5, 2023Global Mobile Gaming Market Report 2022: Trends and ... Business Wire
- Marketing Intelligence Software Market to Witness Steady Growth by ... - Digital Journal January 9, 2023Marketing Intelligence Software Market to Witness Steady Growth by ... Digital Journal